Finding a clinical assessment scale - Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation

< Back

Subject of the scale: Hip - knee

International Knee Documentation Committee Subjective Knee Form 2000 (IKDC)

 

Download / Print :    PDF

 

Description:

This is a new version of the initial IKDC proposed by the ESSKA (European Society for Sports traumatology Knee Surgery and Arthroscopy) and the AOSSM (American Orthopedic Society for Sports Medicine), little used previously owing to its complex method of calculation.

This self-assessment questionnaire is divided into three parts (symptoms, sports activities, function) and gives a score between 0 (worst) and 100 (best). This result is interpreted as a measurement of the capacity of the function, such that the highest results represent the highest performing levels of the function and the lowest levels of the symptoms. A result of 100 means that there is no limit to the daily activities and sports and that there are no symptoms.

The standards have been calculated according to age and sex [3]:
. for men, 18-24 years=89 +/- 18, 25-34 years=89 +/- 16, 35-50 years=85 +/- 19, 51-55 years=77 +/- 23;
. for women: 18-24 years=86 +/- 19, 25-34 years=86 +/- 19, 35-50 years=80 +/- 23), 51-55 years=71 +/- 26.

Thus in a young population, a KDC of over 70% is considered necessary to resume sport.

> Access to the scale is free.

Psychometric properties:

Criteria

Psychometric properties

References

Validity

Face validity

 

Content validity

[1]

Criterion validity

Concurrent validity

 

Predictive validity

 

Construct validity

Convergent validity

 

Divergent validity

 

Discriminant validity
(sensitivity and distinctiveness)

 

Reliability

Intra-rater reliability

 

Inter-rater reliability

 

Test-retest

[1]

Internal consistency (alpha)

[1]

Responsiveness

[2]

General comment on reliability:

This questionnaire has good qualities of validity, sensitivity to change and reproducibility on knee injuries [2].
The validity has been correlated with the physical function items of the SF 36 quality of life questionnaire (Pearson coefficient r=0.47-0.66).
Its internal consistency is excellent with an alpha coefficient at 0.92 and its test-retest reproducibility is 0.95.
Irrgang & al. showed that a variation of 11.5 points has the best sensitivity and 20.5 the best specificity to change for the subjective IKDC, with an effect size (ES) of 1.13 and a standardised response mean (SRM) of 0.94. The minimum detectable difference is 12.8 [2].

Reference update:

To notify us of a missing reference, please use: contact@scale-library.com

More information:

For more details of the scale, the comments or the psychometric properties presented here, please contact Dr. Olivier UCAY :

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .     Copyright © 2012 Cytisco - Web Agency. All rights reserved     . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .